Strengthening rail connectivity between South-East Asia and North and Central Asia

31.05.2024

Strengthening the rail network between the two sub-regions is becoming a more and more urgent issue

Existing and planning inland routes:

1) China — Kazakhstan — Russia — Belarus — EU. Key route for EU — China links. The challenges are geopolitical trade restrictions and sanctions

2) Trans-Caspian route (TITR, Middle Corridor). Second best option to deliver Chinese goods and Kazakhstan’s exports to the EU. Fully operational, but requires capacity expansions.

3) China — Kazakhstan — Uzbekistan — Iran— Türkiye — EU (Southern corridor). Linking the EU and China through countries with the largest populations, including I.R.Iran and Türkiye.

4) China — Kyrgyzstan — Uzbekistan. The corridor linking the EU and China is under construction

Main challenges for SEA—NCA transport links:

1) NCA — SEA connections are currently not considered within dedicated comprehensive program resulting in development of economic cooperation corridor(s).

2) Inland transport enhancements are not targeted at decreasing trade costs for specific commodities.

3) There is no long-term economic and transport project planning and prioritizing system for the corridors.

4) For each existing route and corridors under construction there is a set of physical and non-physical barriers requiring international solutions.

Actions recommended upon establishment of the corridors management mechanism:

1) Establishment of current and future economic and transport profiles of subregion-to-subregion connectivity:

— Analysis of optimal transportation parameters for each traded commodity to understand optimal transport profiles for each route.

— Modelling of sufficiency of existing plans, top and bottom requirements.

— Agreement on the future backbone connectivity links.

2) Establishment of prioritizing system:

— Development Trans-Asian connectivity projects prioritizing methodology based on national, subregional and Asian wider economic effects from connectivity projects — in partnership with international development institutions.

— Agreement on the certification of projects and relevant certification centers — in partnership with international development institutions.

3) Corridors-based harmonization:

— Elaboration of multilateral agreements on the functioning of the system of commodity flows and infrastructure projects to ensure subregion-to-subregion connectivity.

— Continuation of improvements of border crossing procedures — also based on recommendations on previous ESCAP studies, including enhancement of seamless data interchange and electronic interoperability.

Analytics on topic
Report
11.12.2020
Report
11.12.2020
EU-China Trade and Investment Relations in Challenging Times
Trade continues to be the least problematic aspect of the EU-China economic relationship. The BRI offers potential trade gains for Europe by improving physical connectivity with countries along the route to China, but it also poses challenges for the EU. While Chinese investment in Europe is growing and has focused strongly on technology, it raises the question of whether the EU should fear losing its technological edge, especially when Chinese state-owned companies might distort competition through foreign acquisitions.
Source: European Parliament
Article
26.01.2021
Kazakhstan: the New EU Green Gateway to East Asia

European Union is revising the TEN-T rail freight corridors under the new Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy, so the effective connection of the Eurasian rail routes with the EU Core Backbone Network is a key priority