Average global air freight rates dropped by around 10% in June compared with the year-to-date high seen in May, as a drop in average dynamic load factors was reflected in price declines, new analysis published today reveals.
After volumes dropped in May, global air cargo resumed its ‘long and winding road’ to Covid recovery in June with a 1% growth in demand versus the same month of 2019, as airlines «continued to micromanage cargo capacity», according to the latest industry volume, load factor and rates data from analysts CLIVE Data Services and TAC Index.
As in earlier months of 2021, CLIVE Data Services is continuing to focus on comparing the current state of the market to pre-Covid 2019 levels — as well as providing the 2020 year-over-year comparison — to offer a meaningful perspective of the air cargo industry’s performance.
While chargeable weight in June 2021 returned to growth after the 4% fall in May versus 2019, market analysis shows the buoyant air freight rates and load factors of recent months, whilst still at a high level, do appear to be declining marginally. Versus 2020, last month’s demand was +36%. The available global capacity compared to the pre-Covid market conditions of 2019 was −22%, but up 31% over June 2020.
Based on analyses of both the volume and weight perspectives of cargo flown and capacity available, CLIVE’s ‘dynamic load factor’ for June was +9% pts versus 2019, and −1% pts versus June 2020.
«June’s performance data was relatively strong and seems to confirm that May’s decline was a one-off, as we anticipated — impacted by the public holidays during that month,» commented Niall van de Wouw, managing director of CLIVE Data Services. «The global air cargo market now seems to be back on track, reflecting what The Economist has described as the ‘long goodbye’ to Covid’s impact on our everyday lives.
«However, this modest growth is much more related to the lack of capacity supply than strong demand, given the uncertainly that still exists internationally. In June, we once again saw no signs of recovery in capacity. It is abundantly clear that airlines are micromanaging their flights because the pressure is everywhere and, in the case of cargo-only services by passenger airlines, the capacity out there is expensive to operate.»
He continued: «If rates continue to decline, they are expected to take capacity out of the market — but, overall, we expect load factors and rates to stay elevated, with no short-term trend to change this.»
Drop in dynamic load factor
CLIVE’s weekly and monthly global air cargo market analysis for June revealed a continuing year-over-year drop in dynamic load factor. Although this is up 9 percentage points compared to the level seen in 2019, compared to 2020 data load factors have decreased from 72% in March, 71% in April, 70% in May, and now to 69% in June 2021.
TAC Index also pointed to the current level of ‘constrained capacity’ and its impact on strong load factors and demand.
«There are growing concerns that capacity will continue to be constrained for some time as passenger operations start to pick up, reducing available bellyhold capacity and opportunities for cargo-only services,» said Gareth Sinclair of TAC.
Air freight rates drop
He highlighted that air freight spot rates had dropped during most of June compared with the highs of the previous month, before recovering slightly in the latter part of the month, noting: "The BAI (Baltic Air Freight Indices) decreased by 10% in June over the year-to-date high seen in May, with week-on-week reductions until the final week in June, which saw a modest improvement. 15 of the 17 trade lane indexes saw a reduction over May with only SIN to SEA showing good growth at 4% and LHR to SEA up a modest 0.3%.
«Although the index was down on May, it was still positive versus last year at +18% and, versus 2019, by 88%, reflecting both the level of demand and continuing constraints in capacity. Overall, demand was relatively flat in June over May, but this continues to differ by trade lane.
«Dynamic load factors from Europe to New York and Chicago continue to be over 80%, for example, driving stronger pricing levels compared to trade in the opposite direction, where demand is not so strong.»
Both the China and Hong Kong markets saw price declines in June over May of 9% and 15% respectively, TAC Index stated, while the European market continues to be volatile.